Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Armstead v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2015Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION BY

President Judge DAN PELLEGRINI.

This case involves the grant of a variance from the provisions of the City of Philadelphia Zoning Code to permit Franklin Institute to change an existing passive two-face sign to a digital two-face sign with its message changing every 20 seconds. The sign, not large as signs go, is freestanding on the north side of the building facing Aviator Park which is part of the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, itself a part of the Fairmount Park system of Philadelphia. Residential properties are within 700-800 feet of the proposed sign.

The property is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API