Legal Opinion

Barham v. Hawk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2006No. 461PA04PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Robinson v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hall v. TOREROS II, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Katy v. CapriolaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Day v. BrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Day v. BrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API