Connally v. Hall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Torts. Title. Before Judge Maddox. Walker superior court. February term, 1889. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant to recover damages for overflowing his land,' whereby his crops were destroyed. Evidence was introduced tending to show that Connally was in possession of the land overflowed, and had a right to the use and occupation thereof; also to establish his damages by reason of such overflow. It was further shown that while Connally was in possession of this land, the defendant had a deed to the same; that he had made a bond for titles to Connally for the same; that such deed and *199bond for titles was security for a sum of money…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Daniel v. Perkins Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Harlow v. PulsiferSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
- Snipes v. Dexter Gin Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Teston v. TestonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Swinson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.