Hartle v. Packard Elec.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
626 So.2d 106 (1993)
Shirl E. HARTLE
v.
PACKARD ELECTRIC, A DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Ted Flowerday and Ivon Pickens.
No. 90-CA-1233.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
October 21, 1993.
Dixon L. Pyles, Pyles & Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.
Paul O. Miller, III, W. Thomas Siler, Jr., Phelps Dunbar, Jackson, for appellee.
Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PITTMAN and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ.
PITTMAN, Justice, for the court:
On June 9, 1987, Hartle filed a complaint alleging civil conspiracy, unjustifiable interference with contractual relationships and prospective economic advantages, and breach…
Also in this document: Dissent · McRAE; Dissent · McRAE.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Barry L. Conrad v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. And Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Perry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Lee v. Golden Triangle Planning & Development DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Cothern v. Vickers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Brown v. Inter-City Federal BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- Morrison v. MSETCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.