Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Goetz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2005No. 2004-2107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On February 12, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged that respondent, William G. Goetz, had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by preparing contractual and estate-planning documents for Richard J. and Olajeane K. Faulkner. Respondent was served with the complaint but did not file an answer, and relator filed a motion for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VH(7)(B). The Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law granted the motion, making findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation.

{¶ 2} Respondent is not and has never been an attorney admitted to the practice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Chelsea Title Agency of Dayton, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. HannaOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KafeleOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Schwab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API