Disciplinary Counsel v. Goetz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} On February 12, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged that respondent, William G. Goetz, had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by preparing contractual and estate-planning documents for Richard J. and Olajeane K. Faulkner. Respondent was served with the complaint but did not file an answer, and relator filed a motion for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VH(7)(B). The Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law granted the motion, making findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation.
{¶ 2} Respondent is not and has never been an attorney admitted to the practice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Chelsea Title Agency of Dayton, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. HannaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KafeleOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Schwab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021