Legal Opinion

State v. Crockett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1930No. 22456. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

Appellant was, by á jury, found guilty of the crime of possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell. A motion for a new trial was interposed, and thereafter, according to the entries in the journal of the trial court, the following occurred:

“Monday, December 2,1929. Hon. H. G. Sutton, Judge
“8964 — State of Washington

vs.

“George T. Crockett
“Hearing* on motion for new trial and sentencing of defendant comes on this day. State of Washington represented by James W. Bryan, Pros. Atty., defendant in court in person and by Marion Garland, Esq.
“Motion for' new trial denied.
“Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Echtle v. CardWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Crockett v. SuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Johnson v. California-Washington Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Graham v. Yakima Stock Brokers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API