Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 2002No. A01A2450, A01A2451Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAndrews, Presiding Judge

Case No. A01A2451

1. I fully concur in, and welcome, the majority’s acknowledgment, although late in the tortured appellate history of this case, that “the Clarks clearly lost their [Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (‘RICO’)] judgment and the directed verdict holding that Security wrongfully interfered with their property rights by wrongfully rescinding their insurance coverage.”

I concur in Division 5 (a), which concludes that the issues of the amount of attorney fees and liability for and amount of punitive damages “must be retried because the award was based on all three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roulain v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Security Life Insurance Co. of America v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Clark v. Security Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Bacote v. WyckoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API