Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1973No. 48284PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. Where several defendants are jointly indicted,

the overruling of one of the defendant’s motion for severance, made on the ground that because two of the defendants were not going to be sworn so as to be subject to cross examination but make only an unsworn statement, the movant would be denied his rights to be confronted by his accuser and to cross examine the witnesses against him, was not error. The codefendants were not the defendant’s accusers, neither were they witnesses against him. Nor was he denied the right of counsel, as further contended, because his counsel could…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Purvis v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Porch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Quaid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Merrill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API