Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Ahmann

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 19, 1978No. 59968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question here in whether areas of streets on which parking is permitted are part of the roadway defined in our motor vehicle statutes. In instructing the jury on plaintiff Richard Kearney’s duty to drive his motorcycle on the right half of the roadway under § 321.297(1), The Code, 1975, the trial court said, “[T]he portions of the street in which.parking is permitted shall not be considered as part of the roadway.” Plaintiff excepted to the instruction and now assigns the adverse ruling on his exception as error. We hold the court erred in giving the instruction and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iowa National Industrial Loan Co. v. Iowa State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Blanton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Elswick v. Charleston Transit Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Lahn v. PrimgharSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Ex Parte Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. McCabe v. MacAulayDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  4. Hammer v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. City of Brundidge v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API