Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Danberg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 2011No. 11-9002PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
A class of inmates sentenced to death by the State of Delaware and named plaintiff Robert W. Jackson, III (collectively referred to in this opinion as “Plaintiffs”), appeal from the District Court’s denial of their motion to reopen and their motion for a stay of Jackson’s execution. After careful review, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion, and, accordingly, we affirm.
I
A. Facts
This is our second encounter with a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenge related to Delaware’s lethal injection protocol. Much of the background factual…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Ringo v. LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Raymond Holloway, Jr. v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Joaquin FoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.