Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Pustilnik
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 13, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04315Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 13, 2024 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION YVETTE S. ATKINSON, § § Plaintiff. § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-cv-04315 § STEPHEN PUSTILNIK, et al., § § Defendants. § OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Yvette Atkinson has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. 56. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 governs leave to amend, providing that a district “court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2). Although the decision to grant or deny leave to amend is technically “within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Jebaco, Inc. v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- H. H. Henderson, Dwaine Lee Henderson, Cross v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hernandez v. West Texas TreasuresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023