Legal Opinion

Charlebois v. Angels Baseball LP

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 30, 2012No. Case No. SACV 10-0853 DOC(ANx)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Final Approval of Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Enhancement Fees (Dkt. 95) filed by Plaintiff J Paul Charlebois (“Plaintiff’). After considering the moving papers and oral argument, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. Plaintiff Qualifies As A Party Entitled to Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees Under Both Federal and California Statutes

Plaintiff moves for fees under three statutes: (1) Section 12205 of Title 42 of the United States Code; (2) California Civil Code Section 55; and (3)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kerkeles v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. K.M. ex rel. Bright v. Tustin Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Sierra Club v. McCarthyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES LLC D/B/A GENESIS DIAGNOSTICS v. UPMC HEALTH PLAN INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Borenstein v. The Animal FoundationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API