Legal Opinion

Mehner v. Panera

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided May 2, 2024No. 8:22-cv-00168Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARK A. MEHNER, Plaintiff, 8:22CV168 v. MEMORANDUM PANERA, LLC, JOHN DOE, and JANE AND ORDER DOE, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on defendant Panera, LLC’s (“Panera”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 103). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); NECivR 7.1 and 56.1. Panera seeks dismissal of all of plaintiff Mark A. Mehner’s (“Mehner”) remaining claims. Mehner asserts the motion should be denied.1 Panera properly filed and supported a Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts (Filing No. 104) (“PSMF”) in support of its motion…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API