Legal Opinion

Thorne v. U-Haul of Metro D.C. Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1990No. 88-516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, Senior Judge:

After obtaining a jury verdict for damages in the amount of $6,000 for personal injuries incurred in an automobile accident, appellant urges this court to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial on the ground that such award was patently inadequate. Pointing out that the recovery allowed fell far short of compensating him for his medical expenses, appellant argues that the verdict reached by the jury was shaped by an erroneous ruling admitting testimony which should have been excluded. A review of the record as a whole, however, reveals ample evidence to support the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Washington Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. Eula A. TawneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Rotan v. EganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. WestleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API