Legal Opinion

Carlile v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to District Court of Arapahoe County. Application in the district court for a writ of mandamus. Judgment for respondent. Petitioner brings the record to this court for review by writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

The petitioner below, as state treasurer, asked that respondent, as state auditor, be commanded to issue to petitioner certain warrants for his services as treasurer of the state of Colorado at the rate of six thousand dollars per annum. Respondent refused to issue''warrants for any greater sum than-at the rate of three thousand dollars per annum. Upon demurrer to the petition, the district court held the petitioner’s-claim insufficient in law,- and dismissed the proceeding.

The conceded facts of the case are as follows-: At the reg-' ular state election in November, 1890, Hon. James N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  2. People ex rel. Livesay v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Governor's ProclamationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Blakeley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Blakeley v. People ex rel. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  4. Tangeman v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Woods v. BragawIdaho Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API