Legal Opinion

Buell v. S. S. Kresge Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The defendant is moving to dismiss the first cause of action in plaintiffs’ complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In this first cause of action plaintiffs seek to recover the sum of $379,999.68 alleged to be due for increased cash rents of the premises known as 132-142 Main Street East, in the city of Rochester, leased by plaintiffs to defendant.

The lease , in question was dated April 20, 1925. It leased the premises to defendant for an initial term of substantially ten years, commencing on April 1, 1931, and ending March 29, 1941.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zorkowski v. . AstorNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. White v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Wood v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Grill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Church v. Standard Railroad Signal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reltron Corp. v. Voxakis Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Marine Midland Trust Co. v. Village of WaverlyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Buell v. S. S. Kresge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Johnson v. Cheney Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API