Legal Opinion

Fields v. Armistead

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1992No. S92A1132PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Justice.

The parties’ 1975 consent divorce decree required William M. Armistead, the husband, to pay $25 per week in child support and establish an educational fund in the wife’s name “for the benefit of and use for [their son’s] educational purposes.”1 After the son turned 18, Deborah Fields moved for contempt for Armistead’s failure to pay any amount into the educational fund. The trial court denied the motion, holding the provision was void for indefiniteness and vagueness. We reverse.

A contract between a husband and wife in a divorce case is subject to the usual rules for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCann v. Glynn Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Brown v. FarkasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Clavin v. ClavinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Norrell v. NorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pate v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Swisshelm v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API