Legal Opinion

Transit Corp. v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided October 30, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChinn, J.

This suit was brought, under section 5190 of the Code, by the Four Wheel Drive Auto Company (hereinafter referred to as complainant) against the Transit Corporation of Norfolk (hereinafter referred to as *867defendant) to enforce a written conditional sales contract, dated. September 9, 1925, reserving title to three motor basses sold by complainant to the defendant at a total purchase price of $9,869.14, of which the balance alleged to be due and unpaid under said contract is $4,781.26. The bill prays for a sale of said busses, application of the net proceeds to the debt alleged to be due, and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Paint Co. v. E. K. Vietor & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. Oliver Refining Co. v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. E. I. Du Pont, etc., Co. v. Snead's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Watson v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. Tidball v. Shenandoah National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ropp v. StevensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. Shropshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API