Legal Opinion

Tidball v. Shenandoah National Bank

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 4, 1902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Frederick county, pronounced at its March term, 1900, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellee, Shenandoah National Bank, was the complainant, and the appellants and others were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is the second time this case has been before this court. The opinion of the'court on the former appeal (Tidball v. Bank, 98 Va. 769) contains a statement of the case, and a history of the proceedings 'had therein prior to that time. TJpon that appeal the court held that the original bill was demurrable upon two grounds—(1) Because it did not allege that the endorser whose estate was sought to be held liable for the negotiable notes sued on had notice of their dishonor; and,(2) Because it failed to make the original debtors, the makers of the notes, parties to the suit.

It further held…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts' adm'or v. CockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  2. Coles' Adm'r v. BallardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Chapman's adm'rs v. Shepherd's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  4. Whitlock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  5. Bell v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watson v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Shirley v. Van EverySupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Branch v. BuckleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Rees v. Emmons Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. National Valley Bank v. United Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API