Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Greenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

In an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract for the sale by plaintiff to defendant of shares of stock, defendant moves under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the alleged contract upon which the cause of action is based is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds.

Defendant’s motion is denied. As appears from plaintiff’s answering affidavit, although each of the parties to the action signed one of the counterparts of the contract of sale, there was no exchange of either copy, the closing having been adjourned to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National City Golf Finance v. Higher Ground Country Club Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Reed v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Schwartz v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Mishkin v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Love v. SpectorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API