Legal Opinion
Mishkin v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1998No. 19-10614PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UPHOLDING DETERMINATIONS CONCERNING CLAIMS OF CUSTOMERS WHO DID NOT RECEIVE TRADE CONFIRMATIONS
JAMES L. GARRITY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. (“Adler” or “debtor”), formerly a registered broker-dealer and clearing firm, is subject to this liquidation proceeding under the Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”). Hanover Sterling & Company (“Hanover”) was formerly an introducing broker that cleared its trades through Adler prior to the commencement of this SIPA proceeding. Several former Hanover customers have…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. Mishkin (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Cavello Bay Reinsurance Limited v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020