Legal Opinion

Levick v. Bonnell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1940No. 28199PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Section 11421-2, General Code, provides: “When questions of fact are tried by the court, its findings may be general for the plaintiff or defendant, unless, with a view of excepting to the court’s decision upon questions of law involved in the trial, one of the parties so requests, in which case, the court shall state in writing the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law.” The substance of this section has been in the statutory law of our state since the enactment of the civil code under the Constitution of 1851.

This section is applicable to cases tried before the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Industrial Commission v. CardenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bittmann v. BittmannOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Buckeye State Building & Loan Co. v. SchmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BattleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bauer v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Zwick & Zwick v. Suburban Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Mahoning National Bank v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re Estate of HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API