Legal Opinion

Mahoning National Bank v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1944No. 29853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before discussing other issues, it should be determined whether this action against the defendant city by the plaintiff as mortgagee of property damaged by the city as the result of a grade-elimination project carried out by it, to require it to apply on the payment or reduction of such mortgage, such amount as has been agreed upon by the owner and the defendant as the amount of damage done to such property by reason of the prosecution of such project, not to exceed, however, the amount due on such mortgage, is a chancery action triable to the court; or, if not a chancery action, whether the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Satterthwaite v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bauer v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Calumet River Railway Co. v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Nordin v. CoultonOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Omaha Bridge & Terminal Railway Co. v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Buell Realty Note Collection Trust v. Central Oak Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. The Pioneer Savings and Loan Co. v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  4. Van Dyke v. RisterOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Clermont Cty. Transp. Improvement Dist. v. TekulveOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API