Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Stump

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Emma A. Stump, a widow, died, leaving a will by which she gave the sum of one dollar to each of her eight brothers and sisters, and the remainder of her property to a nephew, Roy Zediker, and his wife, in joint tenancy. After the document was admitted to probate, David S. Zediker, a brother, Laura All, Susan Woodward and Carrie Foster, sisters, instituted a contest, alleging as grounds of opposition the mental incompetency of the decedent, that the will was not executed in the manner required by law, that it was the product of coercion and undue influence exerted by Roy Zediker upon the mind…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Estate of GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In Re Estate of MorcelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Dixon v. EckenrothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. In Re O'Connor's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Estate of SelbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. In Re Bielenberg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API