Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 2013PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated March 9, 2012, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly denied his request for a downward departure from the presumptive risk level three designation. A downward departure from a sex offender’s presumptive risk level generally is only warranted where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MigliaccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. PendletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API