Legal Opinion

Weaver Bros., Inc. v. Newlin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1950No. 909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This is a second appeal in a controversy between a landlord and tenant over the keeping of a dog in an apartment. Much of the factual background is set forth in our opinión on the first appeal ordering a new trial. Newlin v. Weaver Bros., Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 69 A.2d 500, rehearing de nied, 70 A.2d 61. Essentially the facts developed at the second trial were as follows.

The tenant has occupied the apartment since 1938, his present occupancy being under lease of September 1941. This lease contains the following provision: “That he (the tenant) will not keep any live animals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Radcliffe Associates, Inc. v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Barnard v. HollingsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Mee v. Marlyn Apartment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. 10th & 5th, Inc. v. ArrowsmithCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  5. Newlin v. Weaver Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shannon & Luchs Co. v. TindalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Skillman v. LynchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Capital View Realty Co. v. MeigsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API