Skillman v. Lynch
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The lease involved in this action in forcible entry and detainer provides: “It is hereby agreed and understood by and between the- parties hereto that this lease may be renewed and extended for one year at a time from its expiration, not to exceed four years, at no increase of the monthly rent, if all the conditions are otherwise agreeable to all parties hereto.” Because gambling was permitted on the premises by the tenant the landlords refused to renew for the year commencing July 1, 1950. Whether by long acquiescence in gambling on the premises the landlords are estopped to predicate their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Saxeney v. PanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Gadsden Bowling Center, Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Pulsifer v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Hanson v. Hanson Hardware Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farmers Elevator Co. of Elk Point v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Cowan v. Mervin Mewes, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Reno Realty and Investment Co. v. HornsteinNevada Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.