Rauer v. Wolf
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to set aside a judgment. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a written contract entered into by the defendants, of San Francisco, with H. Brunhild & Co., of the city of New York, relative to the sale on the Pacific coast of a certain brand of champagne. The contract was dated February 5, 1891, and was to run for five years. The complaint was *101filed May 20, 1895, and alleged that prior to the commencement of the action H. Brunhild & Co. transferred and assigned to the plaintiff all their right, title, and interest in and to their claim and demand against defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Buell v. EmerichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Woodward v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Dougherty v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sucesores de L. Villamil & Co. v. MercedSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1917
- Successors of L. Villamil & Co. v. MercedSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1917