Legal Opinion

The Scow No. 9

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 20, 1907No. Nos. 1,820, 1,821PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, District Judge.

The two vessels proceeded against by way of libel in these cases belonged to the same owners, who were engaged in dredging operations in Boston Harbor under contract with the United States. On November 1, 1906, the tug was engaged in towing the scow, which had on board a load consisting of refuse material brought up from the bottom in the course of the dredging-work, toward a place outside the harbor where it is contended that dumping had been duly permitted by the War Department, according to Act March 3, 1899, c. 425, § 13, 30 Stat. 1152 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New England Dredging Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  2. Jaycox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  3. United States v. EmperorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. the Republic No. 2District Court, S.D. Texas · 1946
  2. Shipman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
  3. United States v. HelenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Christenson S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. The 6 SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API