Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 3, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Commissioner.

Appellant, Dallas Howard, instituted this action seeking a divorce from appellee, *244Betty Howard, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Betty counterclaimed for a divorce on the same ground and asked for lump sum alimony of $30,000, the custody of their son, and for the payment of the costs of the action. Insofar as pertinent herein, the chancellor granted Betty an absolute divorce, awarded her alimony in a lump sum of $23,310, and ordered Dallas to pay the costs of the action, including a fee of $2,000 to the attorneys representing her.

Dallas contends that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heustis v. HeustisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Ralston v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  4. Petrie v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Dalton v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Justice v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Bruton v. BrutonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  3. Sexton v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  4. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API