Howard v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
Appellant, Dallas Howard, instituted this action seeking a divorce from appellee, *244Betty Howard, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Betty counterclaimed for a divorce on the same ground and asked for lump sum alimony of $30,000, the custody of their son, and for the payment of the costs of the action. Insofar as pertinent herein, the chancellor granted Betty an absolute divorce, awarded her alimony in a lump sum of $23,310, and ordered Dallas to pay the costs of the action, including a fee of $2,000 to the attorneys representing her.
Dallas contends that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heustis v. HeustisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Ralston v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Petrie v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
- Dalton v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Justice v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Bruton v. BrutonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Sexton v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967