Howard v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
The present controversy comes in the wake of an earlier one adjudicated by this court in Howard v. Howard, Ky., 412 S.W.2d 243. In that decision we directed that the judgment of the circuit court for alimony in the sum of $23,310 be modified by a judgment for alimony in the sum of $17,335. The judgment on appeal in the former case was affirmed in part and reversed in part, and our mandate was couched in this language:
“The Court being sufficiently advised, it seems to them the judgment herein is erroneous in part.
“It is therefore considered that said judgment is affirmed in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Time Finance Company v. BeckmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Beckman v. Time Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Shely v. VotawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
- Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
- Pruitt v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sharp v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974