Legal Opinion

Peerless Soda Fountain Service Co. v. Lipschutz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1930No. Appeal 145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The record on both sides of this case is lacking in the precision and formality which should obtain in matters of the nature here involved, but the merits are clearly with the appellant. The judgment, the striking off of which by the court below the plaintiff therein now assigns for error, was entered by agreement of counsel, the attorney for defendants acting under authority alleged to have been conferred by a provision in a written contract whereby plaintiff bailed a soda fountain to them. The writing, called a “contract of bailment of hire,” was dated April 20,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Boggs v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Eddy v. SmileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cutler Corp. v. LatshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. West Penn Sand & Gravel Co. v. Shippingport Sand Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Griffin Oil Company v. TomsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Parsons v. Kuhn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API