Field v. United States

*128DISSENTING OPINION

OliveR, Chief Judge:

I am constrained to dissent from the conclusion reached by my colleagues herein. In so doing, I am mindful of the fact that I concurred in the decisions of this court in O. E. Barrant v. United States, 6 Cust. Ct. 516, Abstract 45233, and Bullocks v. United States, 13 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 870. Both of those decisions related to so-called “iron pictures” that were similar in all material respects to the merchandise now before us, and, in each case, the articles were held, to be properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of…