Legal Opinion
K.S. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0624PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dudley and Elizabeth Snee, acting on behalf of their child K.S., have brought this action challenging a hearing officer’s determination that the District of Columbia Public Schools did not deny their daughter a free and appropriate education (FAPE) pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Magistrate Judge Alan Kay, having been referred the case, has issued a Report and Recommendation supporting the administrative decision. Plaintiffs have now submitted their Objections to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of the City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cooper v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Dixon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- M.M. ex rel. J.M. v. FooseDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Moradnejad v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.