Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Lane
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided April 27, 1978No. Civ. No. 2-78-48PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND CERTIFICATE
NEESE, District Judge.
The petitioner Mr. Charles Hasque Bishop applied pro se to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus. He claims he is in the custody of the respondent pursuant to the judgment of February 19, 1977 of the Criminal Court of Sullivan County, Tennessee in violation of his right to a fair trial, Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). He claims also that he exhausted the remedies available to him in the courts of Tennessee as to the question presented to this Court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254(b), (c).
Mr. Bishop was convicted on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Isadore Hodges, Jr., and Andrew Lewis, Jr. v. James Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- William H. Haggard v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, John Taylor Aldridge v. C. Murray Henderson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- GOLLNICK v. ChristiansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Simmons v. People of the State of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024