Legal Opinion
Gordon v. United States Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 10, 2013No. Civil Case No. 12-00671(RJL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judy Gordon alleges that her employer, defendant United States Capitol Police, interfered with her rights and committed retaliation as prohibited under the *114Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq.1 Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim of either interference or retaliation. Upon consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the relevant law, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff works as a uniform police officer during the overnight shift. Compl. ¶¶ 7-8…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Judy Gordon v. United States Capitol PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Ramsey v. MonizDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- White v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014