Soto v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
681 S.W.2d 602 (1984)
Tiburcio SOTO, Jr., Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 464-83.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
December 19, 1984.
Stephen M. Orr, Austin, for appellant.
Ronald Earle, Dist. Atty. and Philip A. Nelson, Jr. and Ralph Graham, Asst. Dist. Attys., Robert Huttash, State's Atty. and Alfred Walker, First Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of heroin. On appeal the Court of Appeals found that appellant raised the issue of…
Also in this document: Dissent · Clinton; Dissent · Miller.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.