State v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge JOHNSON
concurs in part; dissents in part.
I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s affirmance of the sentence imposed on defendant Cannon and concur as to the remainder of the opinion. I believe defendant Cannon is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because the trial judge decided before trial the sentence he should receive.
*256Prior to the start of trial, the trial judge called both defense attorneys and the prosecutor to the bench. Upon learning that defendants had rejected a plea bargain offer and intended to go to trial, the judge said to the defense attorneys in the most vehement…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984