Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1988No. 888SC342Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge JOHNSON

concurs in part; dissents in part.

I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s affirmance of the sentence imposed on defendant Cannon and concur as to the remainder of the opinion. I believe defendant Cannon is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because the trial judge decided before trial the sentence he should receive.

*256Prior to the start of trial, the trial judge called both defense attorneys and the prosecutor to the bench. Upon learning that defendants had rejected a plea bargain offer and intended to go to trial, the judge said to the defense attorneys in the most vehement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API