Legal Opinion

Mayr v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 2, 2017No. Record 151985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH

The surgeon in this case mistakenly fused the wrong level on Mr. Osborne's spine. Instead of operating on level C5-C6, the surgeon operated on level C6-C7. The issue we must resolve is whether a plaintiff in such a situation can proceed on a theory of battery or whether the law confines a plaintiff to recovery under a negligence theory. 1 We conclude that the surgeon's actions did not constitute a battery. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

In an effort to relieve back pain, Dr. Matthew T. Mayr performed a posterior…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Thomas v. SnowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kellermann v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  5. Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allison v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Severance v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Allison v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. Andes v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
  5. Andrew Billups, III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API