Legal Opinion

Babbitt v. Asta

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This was an action for declaratory relief under A.R.S. § 12-1831 et seq. On cross motions for summary judgment the trial court held that a portion of A.R.S. § 11-803(B) (Supp.1975) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Art. 2, § 13 of the Arizona Constitution. The Attorney General has timely perfected this appeal from the judgment. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse.

The undisputed facts are as follows. On February 20, 1973, appellee Pima County Supervisor Ron Asta appointed appellee Dee T. O’Neill to a two-year term on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Isbell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API