Babbitt v. Asta
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
This was an action for declaratory relief under A.R.S. § 12-1831 et seq. On cross motions for summary judgment the trial court held that a portion of A.R.S. § 11-803(B) (Supp.1975) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Art. 2, § 13 of the Arizona Constitution. The Attorney General has timely perfected this appeal from the judgment. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse.
The undisputed facts are as follows. On February 20, 1973, appellee Pima County Supervisor Ron Asta appointed appellee Dee T. O’Neill to a two-year term on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knapp v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Isbell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990