Legal Opinion

Kitchin v. Mori

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1968No. 5373PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

This was a suit by a buyer, Kitchin, for return of moneys paid as deposit and down payment for the purchase of a business. The trial court dismissed the complaint after presentation of the buyer’s evidence on the ground that he had failed to prove a sufficient case for the court upon the facts and the law, and also that no basis for restitution had been proved.

In May 1965, Kitchin and Mori entered into negotiations for the purchase of Mori’s bar, restaurant and casino business known as the “Club Horseshoe,” in Fallon. In June they entered into a written contract…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Quillen v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Harriman v. TetikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Haromy v. SawyerNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lancellotti v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Wilkins v. BirnbaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. AllenAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API