Legal Opinion

Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is to recover for personal injuries. There was a jury trial. At the close of the plaintiff’s testi mony the defendant moved for a nonsuit. • The motion was granted and judgment was duly entered thereon. After the appeal was perfected the plaintiff moved for an extension of time in which to serve a bill of exceptions. The court entered an order extending that time. From that order the defendant duly appealed. That appeal was heard and the order reversed. See opinion in Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co., ante, p. 620, 9 N. W. (2d) 113. The reversal of that order nullifies the bill…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API