Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The action is to recover for personal injuries. There was a jury trial. At the close of the plaintiff’s testi mony the defendant moved for a nonsuit. • The motion was granted and judgment was duly entered thereon. After the appeal was perfected the plaintiff moved for an extension of time in which to serve a bill of exceptions. The court entered an order extending that time. From that order the defendant duly appealed. That appeal was heard and the order reversed. See opinion in Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co., ante, p. 620, 9 N. W. (2d) 113. The reversal of that order nullifies the bill…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976