Legal Opinion
McNichols v. GEICO General Insurance Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 21, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01497Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Alan MCNICHOLS ) 3:20-CV-01497 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY ) JULY 21, 2021 Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 31 Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: This putative class action asks whether Defendant GEICO General Insurance Company (“GEICO”), an automobile insurer, must pay the regulatory fees necessary for its insured drivers to get back on the road following a total-loss claim. Plaintiff Alan McNichols (“McNichols” or the “Plaintiff”) claims that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.