Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Glenn T. Zamzow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2017No. 2014AP002603-CRPublished

1Dissent

*243SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.

¶ 32. (dissenting). The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates an accused's rights "in all criminal prosecutions." Glenn T. Zamzow, convicted of drunk driving, asserts that he was denied his Sixth Amendment enumerated right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him" during a hearing on his motion to suppress evidence. The majority opinion declares, without equivocation, that no such right exists.

¶ 33. The United States Supreme Court has not squarely addressed the issue presented in the instant case. Thus, to decide the instant case the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API