State v. Solar
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAYCE, Chief Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, the State of Texas complains of trial court orders granting Luis Adalberto Solar’s and Fideneia Ur-tado’s applications for writ of habeas corpus. Solar and Urtado contended that their criminal prosecutions for aggravated possession of cocaine are barred under double jeopardy principles because they had previously been parties to a civil in rem forfeiture proceeding. We reverse the trial court’s orders and remand the cases for further proceedings because we find that the civil forfeiture and criminal prosecutions are based on separate…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Almendarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- In the Matter of R.A., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Ex Parte Maria Cervantes Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.