Legal Opinion

Moore v. New Ammest, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 19, 1981No. 51,787PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Swinehart, J.:

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court of Kingman County which adopted the court-appointed appraiser’s value of the shares of stock held by dissenting shareholders to a corporate merger, pursuant to K.S.A. 17-6712.

The following issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether the appraiser used appropriate methods in valuing the stock of the dissenting shareholders at $10.01 per share and whether the trial court properly accepted those methods; (2) whether the trial court and the appraiser erroneously refused to obtain material from defendants as requested by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  2. Bell v. Kirby Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Francis I. duPont & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. Stith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. City of Council Grove v. OssmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In Re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. Columbia Management Co. v. WyssCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Rigel Corp. v. CutchallNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Arnaud v. Stockgrowers State Bank of AshlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API