Legal Opinion

Hill v. WHEATLAND WATERS, INC.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 28, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-2354KHVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant Wheat-land Waters, Inc., (“Wheatland”) terminated her employment because of race and/or national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (“KAAD”), K.S.A. § 44-1009. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 41) filed March 31, 2004 and Plaintiff’s Motion For Sanctions Against Defendant (Doc. # 47) filed May 19, 2004. For reasons stated below, the Court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API