Legal Opinion
Lamar Advertising Co. v. Charter Township of Clinton
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 22, 2003No. CIV. 01-40215PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. Also before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment.” Both parties filed timely responses to the motions and timely reply briefs. The Court elects to proceed without a hearing. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion and deny Defendant’s Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff builds and maintains outdoor advertising displays, commonly known as billboards. One of its billboards is located approximately 25 to 75 feet from the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- St. Louis Park Post No. 5632 v. City of St. Louis ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004