Legal Opinion
Wiersma v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 1, 1940No. Civ. 12034PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
It appears from a review of the record herein that prior to July 29, 1937, the City of Long Beach entered into an agreement whereby it leased space in its municipal auditorium to the respondent Jack E. Daro, who was licensed to conduct wrestling matches in the City of Long Beach by the state athletic commission under the fictitious name of Long Beach Wrestling Association.
On July 29, 1937, the appellant purchased a ticket for a wrestling match to be conducted on that date in said municipal auditorium. Inside the auditorium a ring had been erected which was elevated about four feet above the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Bancroft v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Anderson v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.