State v. LaCaze
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dimmick, J. —
This case presents the question of whether a parent may be found guilty of second degree kidnapping of his own children when no evidence is introduced showing that his parental rights have been limited by court order or decision. We hold he may not be properly convicted of kidnapping and thereby reverse the trial court.
The facts are not in dispute. Defendant was on an extended furlough from the Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, beginning November 6, 1978. The furlough was limited, and did not include authority to travel to the Omak, Okanogan County, home of his four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re the Welfare of MyricksWashington Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CarverWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- State v. WorrellWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Darrow v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.